This is probably the most
common first question asked on the electronic prospecting forums by new guys, and there
are a lot of opinions out there. I am presenting my own opinions here - I not a dealer,
nor am I allied with any detector manufacturer, so I have no axes to grind one way or
another in buying or selling metal detectors. If you are a new prospector trying to figure out what
gold oriented metal detector to buy, you need
to start by asking yourself two questions. First, What do I intend to do with my detector?
Will I be using it every week? Some guys know they want to be able to go prospecting with
their detector, but can only get out in the field for a few days each year, and that makes
a difference. Second, you need to figure out what you can afford, even if you have to
spend some time saving up. |
|
There is no simple one
best detector for all purposes thats why the
detector manufacturers make so many
different models. When looking at the costs, many guys see how expensive the top of the line
prospecting detectors really are and want to cut corners and buy a less expensive
detector. Gold detecting isnt easy, and that may not be a very good idea. You can
sometimes get decent bargains in used equipment, but in the end you do get what you pay
for. Commercially available gold nugget detectors use either VLF or PI (Pulse Induction)
type technologies in their operation. Each has their place, but it is no coincidence that
the guys doing the best in AZ and NV (and many other locations) are doing so with minelab
pulse detectors in the GP and SD series. In certain parts of the mother lode country of
California and also Alaska, there are places where the advantages of minelabs are not
really significant because the mineralization is mild and the gold is
shallow, but unless you know that those are
the only places you will be hunting, you'd be better off in the long run with that more
expensive minelab. Even in CA and AK, minelabs have a big advantage in many parts of those
states. Additionally, the newer GPX series minelabs have made great strides
in their capability to detect small gold. |
 |
|
Many new guys wonder why they can't hunt for gold with an
inexpensive machine made for hunting coins and jewelry - after all gold is a
metal just like coins are. The simple fact is that in general coin and
jewelry machines
make very poor gold detectors as
they just
do not have the sensitivity or ability to handle ground
mineralization that is required to find nuggets out in the gold fields.
There are reasons for this. For searching parks and schools for coins and
jewelry (and similar applications) any of the various coin detectors will be
just fine and work very well -that what they are designed for. However, I
think that for prospecting, they are a poor choice because they are just not
designed for that. People who do coin and jewelry work like a quiet detector
- the no audible threshold mode on so many coin and jewelry detectors is
testimony of this. They don't want to hear hot rocks, little bits of foil
and soil mineralization. The targets they do want to hear, like coins and
jewelry are comparatively large. So the easiest way to make a detector quiet
is to limit its gain and make sure it won’t be bothered by those faint
targets. But that also makes those detectors (and this includes nearly all
coin and jewelry type detectors) unsuitable for prospecting (except on real
large nuggets). You see by comparison to most gold nuggets, coins and
jewelry are 10 to 100 times larger than the nuggets you will want to hear
(maybe even more in some cases). To hear those smaller nuggets, you need a
detector that has a lot of gain - one that by necessity will be powerful
enough to hear those hot rocks, little bits of foil and soil mineralization
I mentioned before. That's why most coin and jewelry detectors (including
the Safari) are simply unsuitable for nugget detecting - they've been
limited in what they can hear to meet the demands of the folks who buy them.
I'd expect most coin machines, with the standard large coil would have a
problem hearing nuggets much smaller than 8 grains (about half a gram), even
if they were fairly close to the surface. Since a good percentage of the
nuggets found with a detector in many places are smaller than 8 grains, do
you want to handicap yourself in such a way as to own a detector that will
ignore the majority of the gold nuggets which are normally detected? I
wouldn't. |
Second, most
ground in gold bearing areas is moderately to highly mineralized, so the
ability to ground balance in strongly mineralized soil is critical for a
gold machine. Most coin detectors are not made to hunt in strongly
mineralized locations because that's not where the coins and jewelry
generally are found. Many guys with prior experience coin hunting likely
have never have seen ground as wild as is common in many goldfields. It’s
fairly normal that goldfields have ground full of noises that sound like
targets or thousands of hot rocks lying all over the place - if your machine
can’t deal with those, you are just out of luck. Extreme mineralization and
all the beeps, clicks and other noises it creates can hide even large
nuggets lying fairly close to the surface.
If you use a coin machine, you will find yourself limited to areas with mild
mineralization and large, near surface gold. That makes for a heck of a
handicap as much gold is small and located in places with moderate to high
mineralization. Most places with mild mineralization and big near surface
gold were hunted out decades ago – these were the targets of the first
detectors developed because the detector operators back then had no option
to buy a machine with higher sensitivity and the ability to handle
mineralized ground.
My honest opinion is that nugget detecting with a cheapie radio shack or other low cost
detector made to hunt coins is a waste of time. I've done both and gold nugget detecting really is
quite a bit different from coin or jewelry hunting in local parks.
On the other hand,
there are some multi purpose VLFs like the MXT and Xterra 70 which can also be used for
coin hunting and other detecting. VLFs which are specifically designed to detect gold
nuggets have an advantage over PI detectors with tiny gold, and have better
discrimination. They are generally less expensive than PI detectors, which is often a
reason many are attracted to them. Unfortunately, they also have serious problems with hot
rocks and mineralized soils which are all too common in many gold districts. In the many
gold districts where mineralized soils are common it is necessary to turn down the
sensitivity in order to use them, which is a serious disadvantage and greatly limits how
deeply they can detect. VLFs work best in old mine dumps, and areas with shallow surface
exposures of bedrock. However in desert areas and other locations where PIs have an
advantage, that advantage can be very large. If you are working one of those regions
where the advantage to the PI units is large, he can be very tough to find gold using a
VLF machine when you are working behind a good PI operator. |
 |
|
Gold is
heavy and it tends to work its way down deep, and here the PI detectors like the Minelabs
have an advantage in seeing gold deeper, especially in heavily mineralized soils. Because
they can ignore considerable soil mineralization, large coils can be used where deep
detection is an advantage. The disadvantage to most is the high cost of purchasing a
complete PI outfit, including accessories and a few aftermarket coils. The other
disadvantage is in prospecting areas with large amounts of very deep trash, where your PI
may have you digging crater sized holes for deeply buried trash this is the
downside of deep detecting. Gold is hard to find and you should not intentionally handicap
yourself getting a detector that will be at a disadvantage in competing with other
prospectors who have PI detectors. The deeper your detector can see, the more places will
be open to you in detecting. Many prospectors deal with the two different technologies by
having both a PI and a VLF detector, but it is certainly not necessary to own two
detectors to be successful in finding gold. |
| |
 |
|
I was plenty skeptical about the Minelab PI units when
they first came out, and I wondered if they were significantly better in the gold fields
beyond what the VLFs could do. It was only after seeing one produce gold in the field did I see
how much better they are, and that they were indeed a significant improvement over the
existing VLF models of the time. If you are going to detect for nuggets regularly in well
mineralized areas, it will be worth it for you to save up and spend the
money to purchase a pulse induction detector.
A big part of this decision
does depend on the part of the world you live in there is no one simple answer that
is perfect for everyone. The USA has many different detecting sites, as does Australia. If
you dont know what kind of prospecting sites are near you and which type of detector
might be best for that location, get some information first and dont rush things.
Take your time and learn before you invest you money. Probably the very best advice
possible is to get the very finest detector you can possibly afford, even if you have to
save up for a bit. Many new guys who have never prospected, enthusiastically decide to
rush out to buy a VLF, but later regret it. They would be better off buying a $10 pan, and
joining a prospecting club, taking their time and learning about prospecting for 6 months
or a year while they save to buy PI detector, even if they end up purchasing a used model. |
 |
|
In the end, much of this decision
comes down to what you plan to do with your metal detector, and what you can afford. If
you can afford it, get both a VLF and a PI machine. I own a Gold Bug 2, a Whites MXT, a Minelab GP
Extreme and a GPX 5000, and use them all. The MXT is a multipurpose detector, and between the
capabilities of these four different detectors, I pretty much have all the bases covered. If you plan to mostly
detect for coins and jewelry in local parks and the like, with only an occasional
prospecting trip, then a multipurpose machine like the MXT or Minelab Xterra 705 might be a
good choice. They sell new for around $700, and a couple hundred less if you can find one
that is used. The lobo supertraq is also a good inexpensive multipurpose machine that can
detect parks and schools, but can also do some work in the gold fields.
For detecting the smallest gold in areas with mild to
moderate mineralization and shallow bedrock, I recommend the Gold Bug II by Fisher (now
part of First Texas and Bounty Hunter detectors). They are still making them, and new one is around $700,
but used gold bug II can be had for around $400 or so. The Gold Bug is a VLF detector
built specifically for gold nugget detecting and does an amazing job on
small gold. However, if you really are
going to be seriously detecting for gold on a regular basis, in most cases you probably
would be better off with a Minelab PI machine. In this class, I recommend a GP class
machine (GP Extreme through the current model, the GPX 5000). A new GPX 5000 may sell for
$5000, but a used GP Extreme can currently be purchased for around $1100. Some SD class Minelab PI detectors can sell for as little as $700 (SDs are an older model of minelab
Prospecting PI type detector). Unless money really is no object, take your time and think
about what you want to do, dont rush, and as I said, get the very finest detector
you can possibly afford. |
| |