|
First Gold-Quartz
Discoveries |
|
|
|
|||
Early Struggles of the
Quartz Miners The chief trouble was inexperience in saving the gold, and in the deceptive nature of the ore ; for the rich pockets which had led to the erection of costly mills were found to be contained in the least promising veins. Hundreds were ruined. A reaction set in. Quartz mining fell into disrepute, and mills were left to decay. A few prudent men, and those with very rich ledges, persevered, however, aided by arastras and other simple, inexpensive machinery. Their success spread valuable lessons, which by 1853 led to a revival of confidence, and two years later saw threescore mills in operation, producing over $4,000,000. Machinery was now turned to better use, and California added several new processes and improvements with which to advance the industry. The quartz mining industry had many ups and downs in the first 15 years after these early discoveries. In a private report made in 1864, Professor William Ashburner stated that "in 1858 there were upwards of 280 quartz stamp mills in California, each one of which was supplied with quartz from one or more veins. The number of stamps in these mills was 2610 and the total cost of the whole mill property of this nature in the state exceeded $3,000,000. In the summer of 1861 one respected author made a careful and thorough examination of all the quartz mills and mines of the state, and could only find between 40 and 50 in successful operation, several of which were at that time leading a very precarious existence." Many of those old enterprises never did become profitable, but over time the operators of the quartz mills gained experience and made fewer mistakes. Another old time expert said of quartz mining that “No business offers greater facilities to ignorance and folly for losing money and, unfortunately, most of those who engaged in it had no experience and were led by their presumption into gross blunders in both mining and milling. The greatest common blunder in quartz mining in early times, was the erecting a mill before the vein was well opened and its capacity to yield a large supply of good rock established. The commission of this blunder is proof conclusive of the utter incompetence of those who commit it to have charge of any important mining enterprise. If there were any possibility that it should in some cases lead to considerable profit, there might be an excuse for it, but there is none. It never pays. All the chances, including that of utter failure, are against it. |
|||
|
|
||
The next blunder was that the difference between a pocket vein and a charge vein was not understood, and the existence of rich specimens was considered proof of the high value of a mine, whereas among experienced quartz miners it excites their suspicions and distrust. Nine-tenths of the lodes that yield rich specimens do not pay for milling. West Point, in Calaveras, and Bald Mountain, in Tuolumne, the richest pocket districts of the State, are not to be compared for yield with Sutter creek or the Sierra Buttes, where there is scarcely a passable specimen in a thousand tons. The next error was that nothing was known of pay chimneys, and if good quartz was found in one place, it was presumed that the whole mine was of the same quality. In some cases the pay chimney was near the end of a claim, into which it dipped not far from the surface, leaving the mill without rock. In other cases the miner had his pay chimney in his own claim, but lie did not know enough to follow it, and he worked straight down into barren rock, while there was an abundant supply of good quartz higher up. Another error was that of sinking when nothing was found at the surface; a policy that may do in mining for other metals, but is very risky in gold. If the croppings are barren along a considerable distance, deep sinkings will rarely pay; but if the vein does not crop out, the only way to examine it may be by a shaft. Another blunder was that much rock was crushed without examination and without any proper selection. In the mortars it is a common mistake to use too much quicksilver and too much water. It has not been customary to make assays regularly of the tailings, so as to know what was passing off. The mine owners, in a large proportion of the cases, have not resided at the mines, and have not made a study of the business; and no occupation requires personal supervision and thorough knowledge on the part of the owner more than mining. These blunders were gradually corrected, and in time the business was established upon a proper basis with the superintendents being a class are well-educated chemists and mining and mechanical engineers, and the mine owners frequent visitors, if not regular residents, at the mines. Continue on to: Return To: |
|||
|
.